What types of reviews, consultations, and clearances should research with dual-use potential need to go through before it is undertaken?
2
Do you think that a review process could dissuade scientists from doing important research because it could be considered dual-use?
3
Do you think that it is realistic to rely on individual scientists to monitor their own research?
4
Does a scientific journal have a responsibility to withhold either an entire publication or parts of one that contains experiments with dual-use potential?
5
It is now possible to make pathogenic and highly infectious bacteria resistant to treatment. Is there a danger of this research being misused and do scientists have a responsibility to address this risk openly?
